JH
John Hobbs
Mon, Dec 19, 2022 9:55 PM
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
P
philorb@aol.com
Mon, Dec 19, 2022 10:08 PM
Thanks John!Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Thanks John!Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
MM
Mario Motta
Mon, Dec 19, 2022 10:13 PM
Wow, Hubble like
We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Wow, Hubble like
We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
Mario
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
>
> As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
> It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
> I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
>
> I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
> Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
>
> You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
>
> I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
> The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
> The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
>
> Before and after images attached.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> To: philorb@aol.com
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>
> Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
> Mario
>
>>> On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>> To: philorb@aol.com
>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>
>> so I played with another image.
>> last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
>> So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
>>
>> same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
>> all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
>>
>> Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
>> This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
>>
>> Mario
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>> The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
>>
>> Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>> To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
>> Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>
>> Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
>> I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
>> Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
>> The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
>> wow.
>>
>> I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
>>
>> see attached images for comparison
>> Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
>>
>> Mario
>> _______________________________________________
>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>> _______________________________________________
>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
BY
BARRY YOMTOV
Mon, Dec 19, 2022 10:30 PM
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting
Thanks
Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
Wow, Hubble like
We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
Mario
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us > wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com mailto:philorb@aol.com >; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net mailto:bmyomtov@comcast.net >; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com mailto:michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com >
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting
Thanks
Barry
> On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>
>
>
> Wow, Hubble like
> We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
> Mario
>
>
> > > On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
> >
> > John Hobbs
> > hobbs_john@verizon.net
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> > To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
> > Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
> >
> > I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
> >
> > As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
> > It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
> > I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
> >
> > I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> > To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
> > Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
> >
> > Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
> >
> > John Hobbs
> > hobbs_john@verizon.net
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> > To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
> > Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
> >
> >
> > You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
> >
> > I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
> > The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
> > The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
> >
> > Before and after images attached.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > To: philorb@aol.com
> > Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
> > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
> >
> >
> > Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > > > > On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > > To: philorb@aol.com
> > > Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
> > > Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
> > >
> > > so I played with another image.
> > > last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
> > > So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
> > >
> > > same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
> > > all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
> > >
> > > Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
> > > This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
> > >
> > > Mario
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
> > > >
> > > > Phil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >
> > > > To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com mailto:philorb@aol.com >; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net mailto:bmyomtov@comcast.net >; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com mailto:michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com >
> > > > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
> > > > Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
> > > >
> > > > Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
> > > > I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
> > > > Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
> > > > The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
> > > > wow.
> > > >
> > > > I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
> > > >
> > > > see attached images for comparison
> > > > Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
> > > >
> > > > Mario
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > _______________________________________________
> > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > _______________________________________________
> > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>
P
philorb@aol.com
Tue, Dec 20, 2022 12:35 AM
Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com; Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting Thanks Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
Wow, Hubble like We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking. It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195. I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator. The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps. The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image. last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night. So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024. all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now. This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month. Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine. The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !! wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario _______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>; Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting Thanks Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
Wow, Hubble like We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net> wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking. It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195. I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator. The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps. The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image. last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night. So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024. all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now. This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month. Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine. The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !! wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario _______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
MM
Mario Motta
Tue, Dec 20, 2022 12:52 AM
Run noise reduction right after blurX when linear, later apply more noise control if needed
Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:35 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com; Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting
Thanks
Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
Wow, Hubble like
We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Run noise reduction right after blurX when linear, later apply more noise control if needed
Mario
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:35 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
>
> The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>; Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
> I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting
> Thanks
> Barry
>>> On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wow, Hubble like
>>> We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them
>>> Mario
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
>>>
>>> John Hobbs
>>> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>>> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
>>> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>>>
>>> I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
>>>
>>> As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
>>> It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
>>> I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
>>>
>>> I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>>> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
>>> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>>>
>>> Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
>>>
>>> John Hobbs
>>> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>>> To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
>>> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>>>
>>>
>>> You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
>>>
>>> I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
>>> The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
>>> The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
>>>
>>> Before and after images attached.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>>> To: philorb@aol.com
>>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>>
>>>
>>> Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
>>> Mario
>>>
>>>> On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>>>> To: philorb@aol.com
>>>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
>>>> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>>>
>>>> so I played with another image.
>>>> last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
>>>> So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
>>>>
>>>> same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
>>>> all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
>>>>
>>>> Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
>>>> This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
>>>>
>>>> Mario
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>>>> The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>>>> To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
>>>> Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>>>
>>>> Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
>>>> I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
>>>> Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
>>>> The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
>>>> wow.
>>>>
>>>> I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
>>>>
>>>> see attached images for comparison
>>>> Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
>>>>
>>>> Mario
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>> _______________________________________________
>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
P
philorb@aol.com
Tue, Dec 20, 2022 2:47 AM
Thanks for the sound advice, Mario,Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; hobbs_john@verizon.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 7:52 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Run noise reduction right after blurX when linear, later apply more noise control if neededMario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:35 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com; Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting Thanks Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
Wow, Hubble like We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking. It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195. I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator. The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps. The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image. last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night. So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024. all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now. This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month. Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine. The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !! wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario _______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Thanks for the sound advice, Mario,Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; hobbs_john@verizon.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 7:52 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Run noise reduction right after blurX when linear, later apply more noise control if neededMario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:35 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Thanks very much Barrry and Mario,
The next goal is to figure out how to suppress the graininess in the background.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: BARRY YOMTOV via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>; Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:31 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Detail is exceptional! background and whisks have some grainy effects but its a worthwhile tradoff for the sharpness.
I'll start reading the manual and may download the trial after our next meeting Thanks Barry
On 12/19/2022 5:13 PM Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
Wow, Hubble like We can discuss all this next Monday photo session, save these for them Mario
On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:55 PM, John Hobbs <hobbs_john@verizon.net> wrote:
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking. It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195. I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator. The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps. The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image. last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night. So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024. all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now. This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month. Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine. The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !! wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario _______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
P
philorb@aol.com
Wed, Dec 21, 2022 4:30 PM
As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
I think this is the final.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb@aol.com
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Thanks John!Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
I think this is the final.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb@aol.com
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Thanks John!Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYIMario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
BY
BARRY YOMTOV
Wed, Dec 21, 2022 5:08 PM
Wow! Totally amazing! I'm sold and I think its probably worth $99 purchase price
Barry
On 12/21/2022 11:30 AM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to
applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
I think this is the final.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb@aol.com
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Thanks John!
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us > wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com mailto:philorb@aol.com >; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net mailto:bmyomtov@comcast.net >; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com mailto:michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com >
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Wow! Totally amazing! I'm sold and I think its probably worth $99 purchase price
Barry
> On 12/21/2022 11:30 AM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>
>
>
> As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to
> applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
>
> The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
>
> 2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
>
> I think this is the final.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb@aol.com
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
>
> Thanks John!
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
>
> As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
> It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
> I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
>
> I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
> Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
>
> You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
>
> I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
> The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
> The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
>
> Before and after images attached.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> To: philorb@aol.com
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>
>
> Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
> Mario
>
>
> > > On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> > To: philorb@aol.com
> > Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
> >
> > so I played with another image.
> > last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
> > So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
> >
> > same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
> > all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
> >
> > Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
> > This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
> >
> > Mario
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us > wrote:
> >
> > > > > The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
> > >
> > > Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >
> > > To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com mailto:philorb@aol.com >; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net mailto:bmyomtov@comcast.net >; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com mailto:michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com >
> > > Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
> > > Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
> > >
> > > Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
> > > I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
> > > Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
> > > The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
> > > wow.
> > >
> > > I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
> > >
> > > see attached images for comparison
> > > Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
> > >
> > > Mario
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> > >
> > > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>
MM
Mario Motta
Wed, Dec 21, 2022 5:17 PM
On Dec 21, 2022, at 11:30 AM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to
applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
I think this is the final.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb@aol.com
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Thanks John!
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: drmariomotta@gmail.com drmariomotta@gmail.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
Before and after images attached.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Perfect !
Mario
> On Dec 21, 2022, at 11:30 AM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> As per Mario's advice, I reprocessed M51 one more time, applying MultiScaleLinearTransform to reduce noise after DBE but prior to
> applying BlurXterminator (slightly reduced). Then I stretched the image.
>
> The result is a clean background, nice wisp visibility, and much more detail in the galaxy.
>
> 2019 image is attached once more for comparison.
>
> I think this is the final.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb@aol.com
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
>
> Thanks John!
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 5:01 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> Nice work Phil, the whisks are even sharper.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2022 3:59 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with BlurXterminator - better
>
> I had a chance over the weekend to take my time while reprocessing M51 with Pix and the new Blur Xterminator.
>
> As you can see, the improvement in detail is striking.
> It even sharpened and brightened the two tiny galaxies above NGC5195.
> I was also able to bring out more of the galaxy's whisps, per John's observation.
>
> I imagine a comfort level with this new tool will develop over many applications.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 1:15 pm
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
> Phil: Very nice improvement. I noticed that the spirals are sharper but at the expense of some of the whisks of the outer edges of the galaxy.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: drmariomotta@gmail.com <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2022 11:08 am
> Subject: [Photo] Re: M51 redo with blurXterminator
>
>
> You're right Mario, this is a very powerful tool.
>
> I redid my 2019 image of M51 (which I thought was pretty good), by first going back to the DBE step and then adding BlurEXterminator.
> The difference in sharpness is striking. I didn't spend too much time on the other steps.
> The contrast and color would have been even better if I had.
>
> Before and after images attached.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
> To: philorb@aol.com
> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 7:55 pm
> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>
> Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
> Mario
>
>>> On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com>
>> To: philorb@aol.com
>> Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us <photo@lists.gaac.us>; bmyomtov@comcast.net <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>
>> so I played with another image.
>> last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
>> So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
>>
>> same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
>> all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
>>
>> Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
>> This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
>>
>> Mario
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us> wrote:
>> The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
>>
>> Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
>> To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net>; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
>> Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
>>
>> Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
>> I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
>> Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
>> The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
>> wow.
>>
>> I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
>>
>> see attached images for comparison
>> Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
>>
>> Mario
>> _______________________________________________
>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>> _______________________________________________
>> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
>> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us