I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first
attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are
astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to
BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are
sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on
blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original
processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if
I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will
prepare comparisons.
Mario
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best
steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator
processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the
atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes <
philorb@aol.com>; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen <
michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first
attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are
astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to
BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are
sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on
blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original
processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if
I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will
prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Wow! This really helps your imaging of "point" sources.
Bill W
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:09 PM Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
wrote:
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first
attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are
astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to
BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are
sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on
blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original
processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if
I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will
prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
--
William H. Waller, Ph.D.
Astronomer, Educator, Writer, Editor
IAU/OAE National Astronomy Education Coordinator
243 Granite Street
Rockport, MA 01966
(978) 546-2096
U.S. Astronomy Education Clearinghouse
https://williamhwaller.wixsite.com/my-site
(1) Earth & Space Reports - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKrjxN5fU9jGuOfooHc-dMg
http://galacticinquirer.net
http://sites.google.com/site/sciencegazette
http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/cosmicfrontier
https://www.wallerarts.net
Yes, notice that close stars are cleanly separated as double stars on close
comparison.
I just sent another comparison of the Flame nebula... exceeds limit again,
but want you imagers to see the difference, once Mike approves.
Like taking my scope to outer space
No more today Mike, I promise...
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:28 PM William Waller williamhwaller@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow! This really helps your imaging of "point" sources.
Bill W
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:09 PM Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
wrote:
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first
attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are
astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to
BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are
sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on
blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original
processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but
if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will
prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
--
William H. Waller, Ph.D.
Astronomer, Educator, Writer, Editor
IAU/OAE National Astronomy Education Coordinator
243 Granite Street
Rockport, MA 01966
(978) 546-2096
U.S. Astronomy Education Clearinghouse
https://williamhwaller.wixsite.com/my-site
(1) Earth & Space Reports - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKrjxN5fU9jGuOfooHc-dMg
http://galacticinquirer.net
http://sites.google.com/site/sciencegazette
http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/cosmicfrontier
https://www.wallerarts.net
Mario: Wow what an improvement for such a simple step. If I were younger, I would purchase a new computer to use these recent improvements to PIX, but I am having problems of just getting old plus the cancer and I just don't have it in me to spend the time.
John Hobbshobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 2:20 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Blue Ex was easy to download and install, and also seems easy to use.Nice that it is made for PIX.I'll find an appropriate image of mine and experiment.
Thanks again Martio,Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attemptI had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparisonLets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Phil, Russell says best to use while linear, so use right after DBE. You can later use a mild form at the end but lower the amount I found out. FYI
Mario
On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:32 PM, philorb@aol.com wrote:
Wow indeed. This BLueEx improvement looks as clear as a hi-res aerial photo of the Grand Canyon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta drmariomotta@gmail.com
To: philorb@aol.com
Cc: photo@lists.gaac.us photo@lists.gaac.us; bmyomtov@comcast.net bmyomtov@comcast.net; michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 5:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Photo] Re: I am a believer.. blurXterminator
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us; Phil E Orbanes philorb@aol.com; BARRY YOMTOV bmyomtov@comcast.net; Michael Deneen michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Very Impressive Mario!
On 12/15/2022 5:12 PM Mario Motta <drmariomotta@gmail.com> wrote:
so I played with another image.
last week also took the flame, NFC 2024, came out "OK" but was not the best steady night.
So attached is usual processing.... NGC2024.
same data, had to play with it a bit of learning how now, a BlurXterminator processed NGC2024.
all I can say is... WOW. like I took my scope into orbit above the atmosphere.
Like that old "monkeys song,... "I'm a believer" now.
This is blowing me away... comments anyone?
Mario
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM philorb--- via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us > wrote:
The difference is obvious and strikingly bette,r Mario.
Thanks very much for giving us a heads-up.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >
To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us >; Phil E Orbanes <philorb@aol.com mailto:philorb@aol.com >; BARRY YOMTOV <bmyomtov@comcast.net mailto:bmyomtov@comcast.net >; Michael Deneen <michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com mailto:michael.patrick.deneen@gmail.com >
Sent: Thu, Dec 15, 2022 3:10 pm
Subject: [Photo] I am a believer.. blurXterminator
Hi Guys, this new add on to Pix, Blur exterminator is incredible on first attempt
I had done NGC1245 last week for Jan Object of the month.
Looked OK. I just re processed with first using BluX, and results are astounding. I attached both for you to examine.
The stars in regular processing are OK, but by first treating them to BluX.. the stars while still in linear state became much better. stars are sharp, from edge to edge. Also.. note along the left (eastern) side. on blux version 2 galaxies popped into view not seen on the original processing !!
wow.
I am going to test on a few others (1 month free trial by the way), but if I keep getting these results this is indeed a game changer.
see attached images for comparison
Lets plan on full discussion of this next month monday session, I will prepare comparisons.
Mario
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
_______________________________________________
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us mailto:photo-leave@lists.gaac.us