Though I don’t presume to understand the complexities presented, I’m in constant amazement at the exciting developments in this field of research. Each new set of observations calls the prevailing theories into question. I don’t think we’ve got it right yet…

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 12, 2024, at 11:07 PM, Belgarchi <belgarchi@gmail.com> wrote:

@font-face { font-family: "Cambria Math"; }
@font-face { font-family: Calibri; }
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; }
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }
.MsoChpDefault { }
@page WordSection1 { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 1in; }
div.WordSection1 { page: WordSection1; }Very interesting, Dick. I am a little bit puzzled though: I can understand a weaker amplitude of light with distance, but a change of frequency?

I not linked to velocity of the source, what could explain it?

Yves

From: Richard Luecke via Astro
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 1:24 PM
To: GAAC Listserve
Subject: [Astro] Observational study supports century-old theory that challenges the Big Bang

FYI.

https://phys.org/news/2024-09-century-theory-big.html

astro@lists.gaac.us
https://gaac.us
http://www.facebook.com/GAACpage