well, was reprocessing the original subs, more than just tweaking.
But is shows the marked improvement possible with modern
techniques compared with older processing... with exact same data
Mario
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 3:44 PM John Hobbs via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
wrote:
Mario: Quite a change for just tweaking. You have lots of work ahead of
you.
John Hobbs
hobbs_john@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
To: Michael Deneen via Photo photo@lists.gaac.us
Sent: Sat, Nov 5, 2022 3:29 pm
Subject: [Photo] newer processing
Hi photogroup
see the attached images.
I had free time today (got scratchy throat so staying low at home)
So.. I decided to do a test and reprocess one of my older images with the
newer techniques we have all been discussing in pixinsight.
attached is an "old M8"
then the same data with newer processing for comparison.
It's quite an improvement, which is very sad for me... I have about 901
images that could stand "reprocessing..... " 😨
arrgh
something to consider at one of our meetings... how to improve our older
data
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
well, was reprocessing the original subs, more than just tweaking.
But is shows the marked improvement possible with modern
techniques compared with older processing... with exact same data
Mario
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 3:44 PM John Hobbs via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
wrote:
> Mario: Quite a change for just tweaking. You have lots of work ahead of
> you.
>
> John Hobbs
> hobbs_john@verizon.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Motta via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> To: Michael Deneen via Photo <photo@lists.gaac.us>
> Sent: Sat, Nov 5, 2022 3:29 pm
> Subject: [Photo] newer processing
>
> Hi photogroup
>
> see the attached images.
> I had free time today (got scratchy throat so staying low at home)
> So.. I decided to do a test and reprocess one of my older images with the
> newer techniques we have all been discussing in pixinsight.
>
> attached is an "old M8"
> then the same data with newer processing for comparison.
>
> It's quite an improvement, which is very sad for me... I have about 901
> images that could stand "reprocessing..... " 😨
>
> arrgh
> something to consider at one of our meetings... how to improve our older
> data
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
> _______________________________________________
> Photo mailing list -- photo@lists.gaac.us
> To unsubscribe send an email to photo-leave@lists.gaac.us
>
